The Few Who Didn't Shut Down: Managing a Law Firm During COVID-19
While seven states didn't issue stay-at-home mandates, many law firms in those areas still followed others around the country in requiring remote work.
June 24, 2020 at 12:00 PM
3 minute read
Without a federal COVID-19 directive, states implemented their own varying shelter-in-place mandates during the early days of the pandemic. But while the majority of states enacted shutdowns to offset growing coronavirus infections, seven states didn't issue orders barring residents from nonessential activities.
Still, despite not having official stay-at-home orders, most law firms in Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming mirrored their colleagues across the country by working remotely to protect against potential coronavirus exposure.
To be sure, of those seven states, South Dakota was the only one that didn't require any businesses to close. But law firms that could work from home took the opportunity to do so, said Ballard Spahr's Sioux Falls, South Dakota, office managing partner Amy Arndt.
"For most legal firms in this area, there was a period of stay-at-home policies in place," she said. "Our firm is still working remotely in Sioux Falls and we've just started a phase one return-from-home policy."
Since mid-March, Ballard Spahr's Sioux Falls lawyers and staffers have worked from home, with only in-person notary being conducted in the office until the state Supreme Court implemented remote notarization in late March.
Currently, all lawyers and staffers use firm-purchased laptops and work via VPN or Citrix, Arndt said.
To be sure, in some of Ballard Spahr's offices in 15 U.S. cities, roughly 10 lawyers can now volunteer to return back to the office, Arndt explained. Before they are allowed into the building, the lawyer must submit a health form, provide their temperature and not have any COVID-19 symptoms.
During the height of the pandemic, firms in nearby states that hadn't enacted stay-at-home mandates were also embracing remote working, Arndt noted.
"The smaller firms I heard from sent their staff home, but the attorneys came in on a limited basis. In particular, in Nebraska I know they follow social distancing and some of the larger firms worked remotely," she said. "Firms took a cautious approach. Our industry is a service industry and can mostly provide those services remotely, at least most [of them]."
Michael Gehret, of Armstrong Teasdale's newly launched Salt Lake City office, said most attorneys in the area are also still working from home, because Utah counties issued strongly recommended social-distancing guidance.
With regards to the lawyers who are venturing back into the office, Gehret said they usually fall into two camps: They need a quiet place to work or they are "vigilantes" that felt COVID-19 wasn't "real and felt like social distancing, and the stay-at-home mandates [were] completely an overreaction and would go into the office as a protest," he said.
Kaysville, Utah-based solo practitioner Brent Burningham said his already remote firm wasn't disrupted much during the COVID-19 pandemic. While depositions have moved to video conference platforms, clients are still comfortable talking over the phone or in-person at a co-working space, he noted.
When asked if he felt less comfortable working in a co-working space during the height of a pandemic, Burningham said, "I feel more comfortable working in that space now, more than before. It's really easy to reserve a space when I need it now."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250