Did Someone Die? Then Don't Call Me
We're better off having additional forms of communication, but what do you do when these platforms simply seem to increase the potential for being interrupted? Here's how to combat the most common sources of interruptions.
July 01, 2019 at 07:00 AM
6 minute read
How many times has someone burst into your office with news that couldn't wait, only to find it most definitely could have waited? Interruptions can wreak havoc in any workplace, forcing employees to momentarily disregard their own projects and schedules in order to accommodate others'.
|Interruptions Are Stealing Your Life
Everyone knows what it feels like to be interrupted. It can be irritating, sometimes frustrating, and always distracting. But what about costly? Interruptions, even those that seem like they're no big deal, are a big deal. Productivity takes a real hit. According to Gloria Mark, Professor in the Department of Informatics at the University of California, it takes an average of 23 minutes and 15 seconds to get back on task following an interruption. And that's just one interruption.
Studies from Portland State University claim that interruptions increase stress, anxiety and physical discomfort, causing people to be more exhausted at the end of the day.
In my own experience working at a law firm, I saw firsthand how constant interruptions made it difficult to keep track of deadlines. A typical lawyer can have hundreds of cases, and each case has a long list of deadlines. You miss a deadline, and you may very well have lost more than the case. Law firms have been ruined that way.
|Interruptions Take Many Forms, but the Result's the Same
In today's world of digital communication, it's no longer just a matter of people popping into your office or calling you on the phone. Email, text messages, voice mail, apps such as Slack and Google Hangouts, Facebook—the list grows every day. (Keeping track of all those platforms is in itself a challenge, but we'll leave that for another day.)
Certainly, we're better off having these additional forms of communication, but what do you do when these platforms—including the traditional phone and office visit—simply seem to increase the potential for being interrupted? Here are some of the most common sources of interruptions:
Text Messages
Text messages and instant messages can be a convenient way to communicate, but they can lead to problems. For instance, do you answer it immediately? Save it for later? Either way, there's an interruption in your workflow. Studies show that switching from a task to instant message or text message and then back again costs an average of at least 20 minutes of productivity. And if you wait to respond, you also run the risk of the message becoming forgotten or lost.
Dealing with interruptions from texts:
- Switch off notifications.
- Route texts through a personal assistant.
- Set aside specific times during the day to check messages.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, do I really need to send this?
- Be brief and be clear.
- If you don't need a response, don't include a leading question or comment that would prompt one.
Email can be a distraction on a number of levels. Urgent messages are often lost among less urgent or trivial messages. Then there's the problem of how often you check your email. Research suggests that by choosing to deal with email first thing in the morning, workers may even be ruining their ability to be productive later in the day. Some experts have suggested that the habit of checking email can be a self-initiated distraction when coping with feelings of discomfort in the workplace.
Email is also a potential source of “decision fatigue”—a state in which a person's ability to prioritize, or even accomplish basic tasks, is hampered by the mental exhaustion associated with making too many decisions in a day.
Dealing with interruptions from email:
- Schedule time throughout the day to check your email.
- Use tags and routing rules to sort and prioritize your email.
- Respond to your most important items first.
What you can do:
- (Again) Ask yourself, do I really need to send this?
- Stay on message.
- Make it easy to respond.
Phone Calls
When you need an answer right away or if the nature of the call precludes any other form of communication, the phone is still the best option. However, phone calls are particularly disruptive. And while they are useful for time-sensitive information, they actually take up more time than texts or emails because you have to write down any relevant information that you need to keep—and then make sure it doesn't get lost.
Dealing with interruptions from phone calls:
- Use common tools like phone number blocking to avoid unknown callers.
- Route calls through an assistant or phone management software.
- Schedule time to review your voicemail.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, would a less obtrusive communication option work better?
- Be ready to leave a clear, direct voice message.
- Get what you need so you don't have to call twice!
Impromptu Meetings
When a situation calls for multiple people to communicate together and you can't schedule a regular meeting, an impromptu meeting is your best bet. But, by its very nature, this is the most disruptive, because it involves more people and it rarely has a set timeframe.
Dealing with interruptions from impromptu meetings:
- Block out time as unavailable.
- Record the meeting.
- Agree on a time to end the meeting.
What you can do:
- Ask yourself, is a meeting necessary?
- Include only key players.
- Be ruthless in staying on topic.
Reclaim Your Life, One Less Interruption at a Time
We've talked about specific sources of interruptions and how you can stay productive, but the most important thing you can do to minimize interruptions in your workplace is to build a culture of “anti-interruption,” or interruption avoidance. It starts when everyone in the office understands how damaging interruptions can be and when they are willing to commit to eliminating as many interruptions as possible.
Yes, some interruptions are necessary, but once you've committed to avoiding interruptions, you'll find that a lot of things that you once thought were critically time-sensitive are actually things that can wait. But to create this culture means a shift in perspective and willingness to adopt new ideas and new tools as you move to a new technological ecosystem. It isn't easy, but you'll surely find the boost in productivity is worth it.
Ryan M. Anderson is the Founder and CEO of Filevine, which is the top-rated case management system for attorneys according to the independent review site Capterra. From its launch in 2015, Filevine has focused on first-to-market innovation and award-winning design.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Wilmer's Bharara to Lead Probe Into Alleged State Police Traffic Enforcement 'Slowdown'
- 2Meet the Pacific Northwest Judges Who Rejected the Kroger-Albertsons Supermarket Merger
- 3'All About Case Selection': Small But Mighty Miami Firm Reflects on Decades of Success
- 4Visa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
- 5Supreme Court of Georgia Disbars 1, Reinstates 1
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250