LSAC Launches Access-to-Justice Legal Tech Competition
The Law School Admission Council's Justice Innovation Challenge pulls law school students into the access-to-justice realm of law and a glimpse into a nontraditional lawyer path.
June 25, 2019 at 11:15 AM
3 minute read
Known more for administering the LSAT, the Law School Admission Council is now accepting applications from U.S. law students with ideas on how to aid low-income people's legal needs for its first Justice Innovation Challenge.
While the solution ideas will vary, the ideas must focus on solving legal issues that are both challenging for low-income individuals to navigate and that saddle legal aid providers with considerable work. These include domestic violence, customer debt, evictions, business entity formation, foreclosures, access to government benefits and others.
“There are so many people not getting legal assistance and legal service organizations are overburdened and we have a complex legal system,” said LSAC presidential innovation fellow and Access to Justice Tech Fellows program director Miguel Willis. ”Folks find themselves not able to navigate the legal system when they have a legal issue.”
Applications for the challenge started in April and will close July 19. After whittling the applicants to 10 participants in late July, the teams will be partnered with nonprofit legal services organizations and mentors to refine their ideas and build their solutions.
Although participants aren't expected to have a ready-for-market product by the end of the competition, a judging panel, which is scheduled to include LSAC president Kellye Testy, Legal Services Corp. president James Sandman and others, will critique the solutions based on their inclusivity, innovation, community impact and realistic implementation.
By Aug. 21, a first-place winner will be awarded $15,000, with $10,000 and $5,000 being awarded to the second- and third-place winners respectively for seed funding.
The program is the brainchild of a similar competition, which Willis noted shows how such encouragement early in an idea's formation can lead to a tangible product. During his 2L year at the Seattle University School of Law, Willis participated in Seattle's Social Venture Partners Fast Pitch competition and won a $15,000 prize for an idea that became the Access to Justice Tech Fellows program, which officially launched in 2016.
With that success in mind, Willis said the challenge can help individuals seeking legal advice and budding law students. For instance, students can see firsthand how leveraging legal technology can lead to nontraditional employment paths.
But ultimately the challenge's main goal is to provide individuals an easier route to justice. “I really want to make this about impact,” Willis said. “We aren't looking for the next blockchain solution that solves every problem, but something community-centered that can help a law school clinic, [a] bar association or nonprofit organization.”
Universities have also looked to law students to help bridge the access-to-justice gap through technology. For example. Cornell Law School has offered a “Delivering Legal Services Through Technology” course while the Chicago-Kent University launched a masters of law degree program on legal innovation.
Associations integral to lawyer development have likewise stepped up. In the United Kingdom, for instance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority recently launched its first access-to-justice challenge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250