Litify Raises $50 Million, Eyeing Expansion Into Corporate Legal, Mid-Sized Firms
After focusing on plaintiffs firms for roughly two years, Litify is now streamlining its technology to appeal to corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
June 17, 2019 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Practice management software company Litify announced it has secured a $50 million Series A investment, and it aims to use the capital to expand into corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
The early June announcement came roughly a year after Litify raised $2.5 million from investor Esquire Financial Holdings, a holding company for professional and legal services-facing Esquire Bank in May 2018. Along with its investment, Esquire Financial Holdings also acquired a 5% ownership interest in Litify.
This latest $50 million funding was made by investment firm Tiger Global Management, which is now a shareholder in the company. Litify founder Reuven Moskowitz said the company will address the transparency, automation, efficiency and client experience concerns of corporate legal departments and small and midsize firms.
“When we started Litify, we believed that the broader legal tech market was really in need of disruption, and the problems we solved over the last two or so years in the plaintiffs market are what lawyers everywhere face,” Moskowitz said.
Up until now, mostly plaintiffs firms have leveraged Litify's cloud-based features that include detailing client intake; storing, accessing and managing a legal matter's documents; and data analysis.
While Moskowitz has prior experience with plaintiffs attorneys, and is currently COO of personal injury firm Morgan & Morgan, he noted that Litify will bring its solution to the broader legal industry with preconfigured tools and templates that are “lightweight but enterprise-level tools so they can scale.”
Moskowitz explained there's “a competitive advantage to have that enterprise-level feature in a straightforward and easy fashion for firms that are still growing.”
Litify joins a long list of practice management software providers including Clio, MyCase and Rocket Matter that are targeting midmarket and boutique law firms. However Moskowitz said his company differs because it provides enterprise-level solutions without much technical expertise required to set up and deploy.
He noted that a platform's ease of use and integration with multiple applications is valued by law firms. Indeed, similar to Litify, many other companies have touted and expanded their integrations with other platforms as a key selling point to clients and potential investors.
Earlier this month, knowledge management and e-discovery startup Onna announced it raised $11 million from investors that included Dropbox and Slack. In an interview with Legaltech News, Onna founder and CEO Salim Elkhou said the company plans to add additional integrations for clients to quickly collect and search data. Likewise, Bill4Time branched out from solely offering time management solutions to developing practice management solutions that cover a legal matter from client intake to final billing invoices. Similarly, during ILTACON 2018, OpenText announced it was streamlining how it produces and sells legal products to offer clients a “one-stop-shop” suite of legal tools.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Many Legal Jobs Will be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
Legal Tech Rundown: Opus 2 Opens Office in UAE, FTI Technology Announces Launch of Multiple AI Solutions and More
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, Co-Counsel File 9th Circuit Appeal in Lawsuit Targeting GitHub's Use of Code to Train AI Models
JAMS Launches Initiative to Leverage AI Technology in Dispute Resolution
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Eleanor M. Lackman of Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp has entered an appearance for Canon, the Japanese camera maker, and the Brooklyn Nets in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed Sept. 16 in California Central District Court by T-Rex Law on behalf of technology company Phinge Corporation, pursues claims against the defendants for their ongoing use of the 'Netaverse' mark. The suit contends that the defendants' use of the mark in connection with a virtual reality platform will likely create consumer confusion. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall, is 2:24-cv-07917, Phinge Corporation v. Yankees Entertainment and Sports Network, LLC et al.
Who Got The Work
Fox Rothschild partner Glenn S. Grindlinger has entered an appearance for Garage Management Company in a pending lawsuit over alleged wage-and-hour violations. The case was filed Aug. 31 in New York Southern District Court by the Abdul Hassan Law Group on behalf of a manual worker who contends that he was not properly compensated for overtime hours worked. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres, is 1:24-cv-06610, Bailey v. Garage Management Company LLC.
Who Got The Work
Veronica M. Keithley of Stoel Rives has entered an appearance for Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC in a pending environmental lawsuit. The suit, filed Aug. 12 in Washington Western District Court by Kampmeier & Knutsen on behalf of Communities for a Healthy Bay, seeks to declare that the defendant has violated the Clean Water Act by releasing stormwater discharges on Puget Sound and Commencement Bay. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Benjamin H. Settle, is 3:24-cv-05662, Communities for a Healthy Bay v. Husky Terminal and Stevedoring LLC.
Who Got The Work
Caroline Pignatelli of Cooley has entered an appearance for Cooley, partner Matt Hallinan, retired partner Michael Tu and a pair of Cooley associates in a pending fraud lawsuit related to the firm's representation of startup company Carbon IQ and founder Benjamin Cantey. The case, filed Sept. 26 in New Jersey District Court by the DalCortivo Law Offices on behalf of Gould Ventures and member Jason Gould, contends that the defendants deliberately or recklessly concealed critical information from the plaintiffs regarding fraud allegations against Cantey. Gould claims that he would not have accepted a position on Carbon IQ's board of directors or made a 2022 investment in the company if the fraud allegations had been disclosed. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Robert Kirsch, is 3:24-cv-09485, Gould Ventures, LLC et al v. Cooley, LLP et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom have stepped in to represent PDD Holdings, the operator of online marketplaces Pinduoduo and Temu, in a pending securities class action. The case, filed Sept. 30 in New York Eastern District Court by Labaton Keller Sucharow and VanOverbeke, Michaud & Timmony, contends that the defendants concealed information that rendered the growth of PDD unsustainable and posed substantial risks to PDD’s business, including merchant policies that made it unprofitable for vendors to do business on PDD platforms; malware issues on PDD applications; and PDD’s failure to implement effective compliance systems. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-06881, Macomb County Retiree Health Care Fund v. Pdd Holdings Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250