GCs Requiring Diversity Say Technology Isn't Fueling Their Decisions
A panel at Legalweek said many GCs aren't leveraging technology to step up their outside firm's attorney diversity, but they are all taking notice and demanding more from their counsel.
January 31, 2019 at 10:35 AM
3 minute read
While in-house departments leverage a host of e-discovery, information governance and legal analytics tools, the panelists of Legalweek's "Using Technology to Build a Culture of Inclusion in the Legal Profession" said they weren't aware of specific software to improve lawyer diversity.
But they noted that legal departments are still actively requiring outside counsel to staff diverse lawyers on their matters, and trying to figure out how to leverage technology toward that goal.
"While we haven't quite gotten to being able to use metrics, we are actually implementing a new matter management system which will not only track our internal matters but also track how our outside law firms staff matters," said Jennifer Heil, deputy head of litigation at MUFG.
Panelist Lani Quarmby, associate GC and managing director of Bank of America, said her company doesn't leverage technology to measure their outside counsel's diversity. Instead, they manually obtain statistics from their outside firms regarding diversity.
Although technology wasn't currently being used by many to track diversity, the lawyers said it has a needed place in inclusion.
"I would always be interested in automating or improving the use of [technology] and not using a full-time employee for combining all these diversity statistics of all our law firms and vendors," Quarmby said.
"I feel that the key aspect is we aren't going to buy, for example, a new system to just track diversity but to the extent we can integrate that into a system that we are already going to use, that is extremely valuable to us," Heil added.
Heil said she thinks there is greater diversity in federal regulatory agencies, in part, because of the government's initiatives requiring metrics tracking diversity hiring, promotion, retention and inclusion.
"You have areas of the federal government where you really do have amazing people like the DOJ and some of the regulators," Heil explained. "They are second-to-none in subject-matter expertise that they have. You can't tell me their salaries are anywhere close to what they'd make as a partner at a law firm."
The issue of diversity in the legal industry has recently entered the spotlight following a public discussion on why diverse attorneys at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison weren't reaching the partner level of the elite firm at the same rate as their white male counterparts.
This week, over 100 GCs signed an open letter declaring their insistence of diverse legal staffs from their outside counsel. Paul Weiss also reiterated its history of inclusion and championing diversity in a firmwide email obtained by the New York Law Journal, but nonetheless said it would be re-evaluating its partnership pipeline and inclusion practices.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250