How to Build an Effective Legal Operations Strategy and High-Performing Team
With a focused strategy, legal operations can add incredible value to a department. This strategy can help legal operations professionals prove their worth and help their organizations meet their financial goals.
December 12, 2018 at 07:00 AM
5 minute read
Like all organizations, in-house legal teams are on a mission: balancing cost-effectiveness with operational efficiency while aligning with the organization's larger efforts. There are several ways to do this. In October, we explored one: setting goals and measurement metrics. Now, let's take a look at another: building a high-performing legal operations team.
We all talk about running corporate legal departments as “businesses within the business,” but that's difficult to achieve without a legal operations team that understands the nuances and needs of the organization. The legal operations function bridges the gap between the law department and the rest of the organization and serves as a crucial advocate for the legal team. Legal operations professionals understand the larger corporate picture and how to push the legal department toward a true business focus that will yield financial dividends and help advance their organizations.
Let's take a look at some of the key factors that define legal operations today, and three steps organizations can take to build their own effective legal operations teams.
Flexibility and Adaptability Leads to High Performance
Adapting to change is a crucial component of effective legal operations teams. Legal issues are different for each industry, and the way a legal operations team works needs to reflect those differences. For example, in a technology company, the legal department might need to be more open to trying new things and focusing on the biggest risks while strategically deprioritizing smaller ones. In a more conservative industry like insurance, the typically low risk tolerance of the legal function might more naturally align with the culture of the larger organization.
High performance legal operations work requires nuance and flexibility. In effect, the team must serve as a conduit between legal and the parent organization, and have a deep understanding of the work being done in both areas. They must understand overall business goals and help legal teams match their work to meet those goals. This is particularly important as those goals evolve—an evolution that the company's legal professionals may not be privy to immediately.
A successful legal operations division also requires professionals to possess several intangible, yet no less important, qualities. Patience, creativity, and a good deal of emotional intelligence—particularly when navigating the personalities and politics inherent to every organization—are all defining factors of a high performing legal operations team.
Strategic Thinking Melds Legal and Business Objectives
Solid legal operations teams also possess good strategic acumen. Remember, legal operations is as much about aligning with a corporation's business objectives as it is about the law. The department must maintain an entrepreneurial focus where success is defined by the client not by the legal department. High-performing legal operations teams can best support this with a clear strategy that resonates with their primary stakeholders.
Here are three steps legal operations teams can take to ensure that they are adding true strategic value to their businesses:
1. Think big but keep things simple: Strategy should be big and bold, yet easy to comprehend. Strategy that extends beyond roughly three bullet points can get messy and difficult to understand, and can lead teams to lose focus. Ideally, the strategy should be so thoughtful that everyone in the department can recite each bullet point, but also have a deeper understanding of what the bullet points stand for, and how success will be measured. Needless to say, the strategy should support the goals of the larger organization, and certainly not conflict with them.
2. Watch out for mission creep and continually monitor for and subtract the unimportant: Once you formulate your initial strategy, you will start to notice that certain activity in the legal department does not align with that strategy. You will also notice factions within the department who want to initiate new efforts that are not aligned, either because they do not “get” the strategy or do not understand that investing elsewhere takes away from it. Ask yourself what would happen if the department just dropped nonaligned activity and reinvested that time and energy back into more strategic goals? Answer: usually something pretty awesome. The only hard part is, helping people see that which underscores the importance of effective communication.
3. Understand the difference between excellent and 'good enough': Legal operations teams manage cost, risk, time, delivery of services, and a variety of other aspects of work within the law department. The reality is that sometimes being 80 percent there is enough—as long as each of these areas meet expectations. Don't make the mistake of spending the majority of time on one thing while neglecting all other areas. Get to 'good enough' and move on.
These three points help clarify an effective strategy, positioning a legal operations team for ultimate success. With a focused strategy, legal operations can add incredible value to a department. This strategy can help legal operations professionals prove their worth and help their organizations meet their financial goals.
But even with a great team and a great strategy, law department goals cannot be met without the right tools and technologies. Next month we'll explore how to design user-friendly legal operations software that helps teams maximize their productivity and show tangible value to their companies.
Nathan Cemenska, JD/MBA, is the Director of Legal Operations and Industry Insights at Wolters Kluwer's ELM Solutions. He previously worked in management consultancy helping GC's improve law department performance and has prior experience as a legal operations business analyst. In past lives, Nathan owned and operated a small law firm and wrote two books about election law. He holds degrees from Northwestern University, Ohio State University and Cleveland State University.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250