SEC Thumps Two Cryptocurrency ICOs for Failing to Register as Securities Offerings
Two SEC orders issued Friday impose $250,000 penalties against ICO issuers AirFox and Paragon Coin, force them to register the offerings as securities, and include requirements to compensate investors harmed by purchasing tokens in the unlawful offerings.
November 16, 2018 at 02:26 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has handed down its first civil penalties to the issuers of initial coin offerings, solely for failing to register as securities in a pair of settlements announced Friday.
In two separate orders, the SEC imposed $250,000 penalties against ICO issuers CarrierEQ, Inc., which does business as Airfox Inc, and Paragon Coin. The orders also force the companies to register their respective offerings, make all associated filings, and require them to compensate investors harmed by purchasing tokens in the unlawful offerings. As is custom in most SEC matters, the companies neither confirmed nor denied the SEC's allegations against them as part of the settlement.
AirFox is represented by Michael Hines in the Boston office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom. Paragon is represented by a team at Schulte Roth & Zabel.
Schulte's Howard Schiffman said in a brief phone interview that the Paragon deal was “a significant matter, which we think lays the legitimate path for ICO registration going forward.”
According to the SEC, AirFox is a Massachusetts-based company that allows prepaid mobile users to earn free or discounted service by interacting with advertisements on their smartphones. The SEC claims that between August and October 2017, AirFox offered and eventually sold digital “AirTokens” issued on the Ethereum blockchain, raising about $15 million in capital to fund a new, international business and ecosystem. The SEC says AirFox told investors they would be able to buy and sell things other than mobile data over the platform.
“In connection with the offering, AirFox stated that AirTokens would increase in value as a result of AirFox's efforts, and that AirFox would undertake efforts to provide investors with liquidity by making AirTokens tradeable on secondary markets,” says the SEC order. “A purchaser in the offering of AirTokens would have had a reasonable expectation of obtaining a future profit based upon AirFox's efforts, including AirFox revising its app, creating an 'ecosystem,' and adding new functionality using the proceeds from the sale of AirTokens.”
According to the SEC, the AirToken launch violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 by offering securities without having a registration statement on file—or qualifying for exemption from registration.
An outside spokeswoman for AirFox said as one of the first corporations to settle with the SEC, the company “expects to continue growing its blockchain platform within a regulatory framework.”
“Our team continues to forge ahead on our mission to democratize financial services for the billions of unbanked in emerging markets,” she said.
According to the SEC, Paragon is a web-based company that sought to implement blockchain technology to help bolster the growing cannabis industry. The SEC says that from August through October 2017, Paragon offered its PRG tokens on the Ethereum blockchain and raised about $12 million in digital assets via the offering.
“In connection with the offering, Paragon described the way in which PRG tokens would increase in value as a result of Paragon's efforts and stated that PRG tokens would be traded on secondary markets,” says the SEC order. As in the AirToken case, the SEC found that the PRG offering violated Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act.
In a press release announcing the settlement, Paragon CEO Jessica VerSteeg said the company had worked on the deal for a year.
“Paragon is making history!” she said. “This resolution with the SEC gives Paragon the path forward to full compliance with the U.S. securities laws and clears the way for Paragon to pursue its vision of bringing transparency and accountability to the cannabis industry through blockchain technology.”
In a press statement announcing the two settlements, Stephanie Avakian, the co-director of the SEC's Enforcement Division said that that the agency has made it clear that ICO issuers must abide by existing regulations.
“These cases tell those who are considering taking similar actions that we continue to be on the lookout for violations of the federal securities laws with respect to digital assets,” she said.
Her co-director, Steven Peikin added: “By providing investors who purchased securities in these ICOs with the opportunity to be reimbursed and having the issuers register their tokens with the SEC, these orders provide a model for companies that have issued tokens in ICOs and seek to comply with the federal securities laws.”
The investigation into Paragon was conducted by Pamela Sawhney of the Enforcement Division's Cyber Unit and was supervised by Cyber Unit Chief Robert Cohen. The investigation into AirFox was conducted by Colin Forbes, Emily Holness, and Michael Vito and supervised by Celia Moore, Amy Gwiazda, and John Dugan, all of the SEC's Boston Regional Office.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250