University-Developed Polisis App Tackles Cumbersome Privacy Policies
For both consumers and corporate users such as attorneys, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection.
March 12, 2018 at 11:57 AM
4 minute read
It is now easier to search through often-cumbersome corporate privacy policies thanks to natural language processing techniques applied by university researchers.
Professors at the University of Wisconsin, the University of Michigan and the Federal Institute of Technology at Lausanne, Switzerland, have announced their new artificial intelligence-guided app. It is called Polisis, which is an abbreviation for “privacy policy analysis.”
How does it work? “Polisis is a framework that allows for automated analysis of the privacy policies,” Kassem Fawaz, an assistant professor of engineering at the University of Wisconsin, told Legaltech News.
“In particular, it visualizes the different aspects of the policies as well as the data flows,” he explained.
For example, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection. For third parties, it shows the type of information shared, the reasons for sharing, and the options users have to control the sharing.
Fawaz said, “It employs novel natural language processing techniques to automatically understand the content of privacy policies.”
Above all, it makes it easier to understand privacy policies, which Fawaz called “our ultimate objective.” He added, “In 2008, a study [by] McDonald and Cranor estimated that it would take the average user 201 hours to read all the privacy policies encountered in a year. Now, with the rise of Internet of Things and mobile systems, the user is more likely to spend more time to read the policy of each website, service, app and device with which they interact. The users simply cannot cope with the depth and breadth of privacy policies.
“By providing more intuitive interfaces that extract the relevant information from the policy, we can reduce the gap between users and the language of the privacy policies,” Fawaz said.
The tool helps users make decisions about privacy when interacting with online services. Surveys have found users care about privacy, and they “need usable privacy-enhancing tools for them to take actions. In our research, we aim to provide users with the tools that help them understand how their information is being collected and managed,” Fawaz said.
It can also benefit other stakeholders, including lawyers. Kang G. Shin, a professor at the University of Michigan and founding director of the Real-Time Computing Laboratory, added in an interview, “Polisis can help lawyers understand the underlying privacy policies quickly and easily, and also explain them to their clients with natural language without relying on legal jargon.”
The app can benefit consumers, too, by giving them a better interface so they can understand the privacy policies. “Instead of parsing pages of unclear text, consumers can view more intuitive visualizations to understand how their data is being collected, processed, managed, and shared,” Fawaz said.
“As a result, they will sign off things with good and correct understanding of the substance in the lengthy, fuzzified policy documents/statements,” Shin further explained. “As is, most consumers sign off [on] things without knowing/understanding the privacy implications in those documents.”
Fawaz also confirmed that Polisis does not restrict companies or businesses: “It only requires companies to provide a privacy policy, which they already do. Polisis automatically fetches the privacy policy from the company's website and processes it.”
A research prototype is available at pribot.org/polisis, and a research prototype for a chatbot that answers consumers questions about privacy policies is at pribot.org/bot.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCalifornia Becomes 2nd State to Give Brain Waves Data Privacy Protections, With Mixed Reaction
Former FBI Cyber Expert on How AI Will Exacerbate Law Firms' Wire Transfer Vulnerabilities
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250