Bank of America to pay $33m to settle Merrill bonuses case
Bank of America has agreed to pay $33m (£19.5m) for charges of allegedly misleading investors about billions in bonuses it agreed to pay Merrill Lynch executives when it was on the verge of acquiring Merrill for $50bn (£29.6bn) in a 2008 merger. The payment settles a civil suit filed in the Southern District of New York by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC charged that proxy materials sent to Bank of America shareholders on the proposed acquisition stated that Merrill Lynch had agreed not to pay performance bonuses and other compensation to executives prior to the closing of the merger when, in fact, Bank of America had already contractually authorized Merrill Lynch to pay up to $5.8bn (£3.4bn).
Bank of America has agreed to pay $33m (£19.5m) for charges of allegedly misleading investors about billions in bonuses it agreed to pay Merrill Lynch executives when it was on the verge of acquiring Merrill for $50bn (£29.6bn) in a 2008 merger, reports the New York Law Journal.
This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.
Subscribe today and get 10% off.
A PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES:
- Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
- Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
- Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
- The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
- Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
- Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651