The Heyday challenge received a setback last week - its argument that mandatory retirement ages are unlawful faltered at the first hurdle. The Advocate General (whose opinion the European Court of Justice normally follows), determined that the setting by national law of a mandatory retirement age for employees is not automatically unlawful. Further he indicated in his judgment that member states have wide discretion when applying the objective justification test.
Although the Advocate General’s decision is not binding and may not be followed by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) when it hands down its decision later this year, it adds further fire to the age discrimination debate.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]