The shift of legal burden from employee to employer in a discrimination case must be justified by more than simply difference in status and treatment
On 26 January, 2007, the Court of Appeal (CA) ruled in favour of City bank Nomura in the long-running alleged sexual discrimination claim brought against it by former employee Andrea Madarassy. The ruling not only provides clarity on the issue of sex discrimination but also builds a useful framework for employers, employees and the courts in determining future claims of discrimination.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]