The ECJ's judgment
July 27, 2005 at 08:03 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legalweek
The implications of a recent Court of Appeal judgment for the British Horseracing Board are serious; so serious that the board may have to seek alternative funding. But there are doubts about the wider implications of the ruling for database rights holders, as Charlie Everitt reports.
On 13 July, 2005, the Court of Appeal handed down its judgment in the British Horseracing Board v William Hill case.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
