The courts have adopted a cautious approach when considering the powers of the FSA and human rights principles. They will have to be more robust if the aims of the ECHR are to be achieved writes Rebecca Money-Kyrle
Last year there was speculation that the Human Rights Act (HRA) would precipitate human rights challenges against the Financial Services Authority (FSA) and the tribunal established under the Financial Services and Markets Act (FiSMA). Recent judgments on human rights issues have, however, been somewhat cautious.
This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.
Subscribe today and get 10% off.
A PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION PROVIDES:
- Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
- Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
- Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
- The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
- Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
- Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651