Is the Financial Services Authority’s (FSA’s) regulatory enforcement regime criminal not civil? It doesn’t think so, nor does the Government. And market abuse aside, the regime created by the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 is based on the premise that disciplinary and enforcement charges against authorised firms and approved persons will be classified by courts as determining civil rights and obligations for the purposes of the Human Rights Act 1998 and the European Convention of Human Rights.
The classification of FSA proceedings as civil has a direct effect on its power to investigate offences. Being a regulatory body, the FSA does not have the powers of the police or Serious Fraud Office and even where their powers are similar the FSA’s ability to exercise them is restricted; for example, it is the police who execute a warrant and seize property.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]