Adjudication procedures used to settle disputes in the construction industry could be undermining the right to a 'fair and public hearing'
March 30, 2001 at 08:30 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Legalweek
Adjudication, arguably the most radical dispute resolution process to hit the construction industry in recent years, has attracted its fair share of criticism. Many of its features are incompatible with the Human Rights Act (HRA) 1998.
However, it remains to be seen whether the HRA applies, and if so what challenges are likely to be made to adjudication decisions in the future.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
