Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

In the end it was a comprehensive victory for the Premier League, the BBC and BSkyB. There was certainly no need for a penalty shoot-out when Mr Justice Ferris handed down judgment in respect of the Director General of Fair Trading’s reference of three agreements (concerning the television broadcasting of Premier League football matches by BSkyB and the BBC) to the Restrictive Practices Court.In essence, the case concerned the review by the Restrictive Practices Court of the Premier League’s exclusive broadcasting arrangements with BSkyB and the BBC.The court was asked to consider and decide whether certain restrictions in the agreements imposed on member clubs of the Premier League were contrary to the public interest. This included the restriction on member clubs of the Premier League (in accordance with its rules) which conferred on the Premier League itself the exclusive right to grant licences to broadcast on television Premier League matches. The clubs themselves accepted reciprocal obligations not to grant licences for that purpose.As a result of this, the Premier League chose to grant BSkyB an exclusive licence to broadcast 60 Premier League matches live during each season until the end of the 2000-01 season. The BBC was also granted the exclusive right to broadcast on television recorded highlights of Premier League matches until the end of the same season.Other supplemental restrictions were also referred to the court, which reinforced the exclusive rights of BSkyB and the BBC, and affected the ability of Premier League clubs to engage in competitions other than the Premier League.The agreements referred to the court by the Director General of Fair Trading were referred in accordance with the provisions of the Restrictive Trade Practices Act 1976. This is due to be repealed shortly by the new Competition Act 1998.The Director General of Fair Trading, in his role of promoting and safeguarding the economic interests of consumers, alleged that the various restrictions were contrary to the public interest. He submitted that the restrictions, in preventing clubs from individually selling the rights to televise their games and taking part in other competitions, meant that BSkyB had a dominant position in the supply of sports channels in the UK. In joining together and selling their rights collectively, as a league, the Premier League clubs were acting as a cartel. This led to higher prices as, if there were a number of sellers on the market rather than just one, there would be more competition, which would lead to more choice for consumers and lower prices. By making games available to other broadcasters, this would also increase competition in broadcasting and hopefully lead to new forms of broadcasting development, including new regional programmes covering the Premier League matches of local clubs. It was also argued that, by freeing up the market in rights to live coverage of Premier League games, competition in the pay-TV market would increase. Further, as only 60 Premier League games out of a total of 380 in any season were shown on BSkyB, there was ‘unsatisfied demand’ on the part of the public. By enabling other broadcasters to show games, the fans of certain clubs had more chance of seeing their clubs on television during a season.

This premium content is reserved for
Legal Week Subscribers.


  • Trusted insight, news and analysis from the UK and across the globe
  • Connections to senior business lawyers within the leading law firms and legal departments
  • Unique access to ALM's unrivalled, market-leading reporting in the US and Asia and cutting-edge research, including Legal Week's UK Top 50 and Global 100 rankings
  • The Legal Week Daily News Alert, Editor's Highlights, and Breaking News digital newsletters and more, plus a choice of over 70 ALM newsletters
  • Optimized access on all of your devices: desktop, tablet and mobile
  • Complete access to the site's full archive of more than 56,000 articles

Already have an account?

For enterprise-wide or corporate enquiries, please contact Paul Reeves on Preeves@alm.com or call on +44 (0) 203 875 0651


Legal Week Newsletters & Alerts

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your subscription, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters and alerts. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2019 American Lawyer Media International, LLC. All Rights Reserved.