Flawed precedent is making it impossible to patent often life-saving medical discoveries, all 12 active judges say in flurry of opinions.
July 08, 2019 at 12:39 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Top, left to right: Alan Lourie, Timothy Dyk and Todd Hughes. Bottom, left to right: Kimberly Moore, Pauline Newman and Kara Stoll.
Unanimity is rare at the famously factious U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. But all 12 active judges found something they could agree about on Wednesday: the Supreme Court is flat-out wrong when it comes to patent eligibility and medical diagnostics.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Celebrate outstanding achievement in law firms, chambers, in-house legal departments and alternative business structures.
The African Legal Awards recognise exceptional achievement within Africa s legal community during a period of rapid change.
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
