I wouldn’t go so far as to say the legal community has reached a pivotal moment where it redefines itself and will stand from now on for some sort of higher ideal. But recent events have shown us that the legal world has limits. It is willing to live with situations, at least for a while, that many would deem disagreeable, objectionable and even dishonorable. But there is a point at which at least some of its members decide they’ve had enough.

I’m not referring here to the response by international law firms to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which we’ve examined at length and will continue to address as long as the war continues and the news warrants it. No, this week we witnessed this shift in Hong Kong, when two judges who sat on Hong Kong’s highest court, the Court of Final Appeal, abruptly resigned, citing the threat to civil liberties posed by the national security law that Beijing imposed on the territory in 2020.  Since that law took effect, Hong Kong’s national security police have arrested more than 100 Hong Kong residents, including pro-democracy protestors who have participated in the country’s demonstrations and marches since 2019.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]