Less Money, Furloughing and Being Forced Back to Offices: UK Lawyers' COVID-19 Concerns
UK charity LawCare has found that the current crisis is impacting lawyers' mental health in specific ways.
May 18, 2020 at 05:06 AM
3 minute read
U.K. lawyers' top concerns currently include being forced back to the office and the financial pressures caused by the coronavirus pandemic, a legal mental health charity has found.
This U.K. Mental Health Awareness Week, charity LawCare says the COVID-19 crisis is impacting lawyer's mental health by prompting specific concerns.
According to new data from the last two months, the organisation received the most enquiries from legal professionals concerned about not being allowed to work from home.
"My firm is expecting everyone back at work asap despite the fact we can all easily continue to work from home," said one person who contacted LawCare. "I am extremely anxious about it, I can't talk to HR as they've all been furloughed."
"I'm trying to work from home but I have very noisy neighbours and the flat is really rundown," said another. "It didn't matter so much when I was in the office all day but now I am becoming really depressed."
The next highest number of enquiries were from people worried about the worsening of current mental health conditions caused by the lockdown, with others adding that they were concerned about relationship strain, childcare issues and being asked to work whilst on furlough.
Another person added: "I've been told I can't work from home and instead must take annual leave or unpaid leave if I don't want to come in."
Other problems have included relationship strain, childcare issues and being asked to work whilst on furlough.
Another person contacted the charity to say that their organisation's furloughing operations had contributed to greater stress among those still working.
"I've gone down to 80% salary. My firm has furloughed half the team yet we still have 90% of our normal clients, so now I'm working weekends as well to cover the furloughed staff's clients and getting paid the same as the furloughed staff."
LawCare chief executive Elizabeth Rimmer said in a statement: "We feel this is very much the tip of the iceberg and anticipate in the coming weeks more and more legal professionals will contact us as the emotional and financial impact of the pandemic begins to really hit home.
"We would like to remind all legal professionals, including support staff, they can contact us for free, in confidence, to discuss anything that is bothering them. Talking through your problems with one of our trained staff and volunteers, who have all worked in the law themselves, can really help."
Law.com International is supporting LawCare at this years British Legal Awards, entries to which are open now.
|Read more
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250