Tooks Chambers set to dissolve following Legal Aid cuts
Tooks Chambers is to dissolve, citing a loss of public funding as a result of the Government's policies on Legal Aid. The set has announced it will begin winding up operations from 11 October as a "direct result" of Legal Aid policies, and will formally dissolve on Friday 27 December to ensure that all past work is billed and fees are collected.
September 23, 2013 at 11:39 AM
2 minute read
Tooks Chambers is to dissolve, citing a loss of public funding as a result of the Government's policies on Legal Aid.
The set has announced it will begin winding up operations from 11 October as a "direct result" of Legal Aid policies, and will formally dissolve on Friday 27 December to ensure that all past work is billed and fees are collected.
In a statement the chambers said: "The dissolution of chambers is the direct result of government policies on Legal Aid. The public service we provide is dependent on public funding. 90% of our work is publicly funded. The government policies led by Justice Secretary Chris Grayling are cumulatively devastating the provision of legal services and threatening the rule of law."
Tooks Chambers has advised on a number of high profile cases including the Birmingham Six and the AHK judicial review while Michael Mansfield QC has led on the Hillsborough Inquests and is the barrister for the families of Stephen Lawrence and and Dodi Al-Fayed.
The statement added that Mansfield and others are actively pursuing the possibility of reconfiguring resources to create a new and alternative working model based on an electronic hub and a compact physical space.
Chris Grayling announced in April that applications for judicial review – the process by which judges are asked to examine the legality of government decisions – will only receive legal aid funding once a judge has agreed the case is strong enough to proceed to a full hearing.
In May a group of around 90 QCs publicly criticised the proposals to limit legal aid in a letter to the Daily Telegraph.
According to the letter, the plans will include refusing any legal aid to those who do not meet a residence test; refusing to pay lawyers in some cases for work reasonably and necessarily carried out; removing legal aid for complaints of mistreatment in prison; preventing small specialist public law firms from offering prison law advice; removing funding for test cases and cutting rates for legal advice and representation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute readBirkenstocks: Footwear or Fine Art? German Law Firm SKW Schwarz Steps Up in Court
Freshfields and Quinn Emanuel Face Off in Latest JP Morgan-WeRealize Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Penn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
- 2A Voyeur Videotaped Them Undressing. Should Cruise Ship Passengers Have to Arbitrate?
- 3Veteran Federal Trade Law Enforcer Joins King & Spalding in Washington
- 4Practical In-House Insights To Activate AI
- 5Ex-NYC Mayor De Blasio Must Pay $475K Fine for NYPD’s Presidential Campaign Security
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250