Outsourcer Integreon to launch LPO offering in London office
Integreon is to start offering legal process outsourcing (LPO) in its London office, with the move the company's second into LPO in the UK so far this year. The company has space for 100 people to carry out LPO work in its existing London office, which is based in CMS Cameron McKenna's City arm. It will initially launch with a 65-strong team, adding to the existing back office support Integreon offers from London.
November 22, 2012 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
Integreon is to start offering legal process outsourcing (LPO) in its London office, with the move the company's second into LPO in the UK so far this year.
The company has space for 100 people to carry out LPO work in its existing London office. It will initially launch with a 65-strong team, adding to the existing back office support Integreon offers from London.
The move comes in response to increasing regulation around discovery costs set to come into effect from April 2013 as part of the new rules on disclosure included in the Jackson reforms. It also reflects the outsourcer's intention to gain new clients attracted to a London LPO centre.
In January this year Integreon launched an LPO base in Bristol at the request of key client Microsoft, with half a dozen lawyers and paralegals. The base has now grown to around 30 legal staff operating in multiple European and Asian languages.
Integreon president of business development and client relationship management John Croft said: "Some clients are unable to send work offshore for regulatory reasons and others do not want to send work offshore because they want to meet face-to-face with the lawyers doing the work.
"We responded to this need earlier in the year with our Bristol LPO centre, but we have decided that it would also be helpful to have an LPO centre in London for more immediate needs and to act as a starting point for some new clients that want to work with us but are new to outsourcing."
Integreon's client base includes Allen & Overy, CMS Cameron McKenna, Simmons & Simmons, Microsoft and several FTSE 100 companies.
The outsourcer shares the same London offices as CMS at Mitre House, although the document review centre is not associated with CMS, and the the centre is run solely by Integreon.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanadian Media Giants Sue OpenAI Over Alleged Copyright Violations in ChatGPT Training
3 minute readFormer Head of Finance at DLA Piper and Freshfields Quietly 'Struck Off'
2 minute readAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Standing for Plaintiffs in Copyright Suit Over AI Training of ChatGPT
- 2LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 3NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 4ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 5'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250