Bar Council chair calls for LSB to be disbanded
Bar Council chairman Michael Todd QC has called for the Legal Services Board (LSB) to be "disbanded", citing support from Attorney General Dominic Grieve and new Justice Secretary Chris Grayling. Speaking at the annual Bar Council conference on Saturday (10 November), Todd said that the LSB was going "beyond its brief" as a regulator and trying to "shape the legal landscape".
November 12, 2012 at 12:05 PM
2 minute read
Bar Council chairman Michael Todd QC has called for the Legal Services Board (LSB) to be "disbanded", citing support from Attorney General Dominic Grieve and new Justice Secretary Chris Grayling.
Speaking at the annual Bar Council conference on Saturday (10 November), Todd said that the LSB was going "beyond its brief" as a regulator and trying to "shape the legal landscape".
Todd added that he has received support for his views from Grayling, who he said has "sympathy with the notion of over-regulation". Grieve, who also spoke at the conference, said that he too had raised the issue of over-regulation in the legal profession with Grayling.
In addition, Todd drew attention to the costs incurred at the Bar to support the LSB, stating: "The LSB doesn't mind what it spends. They are not using their own money".
In the closing address to the conference, Grieve said: "The LSB is not exactly flavour of the month with any of the professions. I think there are justifiable concerns that it may at times tend towards micro-management. I do share the Bar's concern with that."
A LSB spokesperson said of Todd's comments: "We have noted with interest."
The news comes after much discussion over the LSB's role in recent months, after the body passed the Government's triennial review largely unchanged. Both the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and the Law Society have called for it to be scaled back and potentially abolished.
The LSB acts as an over-arching regulator for the legal profession, supervising bodies including the Law Society, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the BSB.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
Germany’s Wirecard Case Moves to Airport Hangar to Accommodate 100 Lawyers
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1LA Judge Anne Hwang Confirmed to the Federal Bench
- 2NY Court Leaders Ask for 10% Judiciary Budget Increase
- 3ClaimClam Wanted to Boost Class Action Claims Rates. But Judges and Attorneys Fought Back
- 4'We Will Sue ... Immediately': AG Bonta Says He's Ready to Spend $25M Battling Trump
- 511 Red State AGs Demand Damages in Antitrust Lawsuit Shaming ESG Climate Investors
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250