Top firms break ground with project to boost access to law, but challenge has only begun
Despite already being touted as a landmark for the industry, the law firms behind the initiative aimed at improving access to the profession are hoping to substantially expand the number of firms backing the scheme. The scheme launched with 23 major firms across the UK and Ireland but the backers of the project to hand work experience to under-privileged children believe it will be essential to secure the active support of more law firms before addressing the considerable challenge of building links and co-operation with a broad base of schools nationally.
September 14, 2011 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
23 firms back work experience scheme but pressure will be on to earn support from schools and profession
Despite already being touted as a landmark for the industry, the law firms behind the initiative aimed at improving access to the profession are hoping to substantially expand the number of firms backing the scheme.
The scheme launched with 23 major firms across the UK and Ireland but the backers of the project to hand work experience to under-privileged children believe it will be essential to secure the active support of more law firms before addressing the considerable challenge of building links and co-operation with a broad base of schools nationally.
The project, dubbed PRIME, marks the first time that so many large law firms have come together in a comparable initiative, with the firms involved aiming to hand out around 2,500 work experience placements a year to state school children from disadvantaged backgrounds by 2015.
Legal Week has agreed to support the venture with free links and advertising across its print and online platforms.
The initiative, which is the result of discussions held earlier this year by a number of City law firms including Allen & Overy (A&O) and Norton Rose, has also received input from the Cabinet Office and is supported by the Sutton Trust and the law societies of England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland.
Each firm signing up to PRIME must commit to providing an annual number of work experience placements to eligible students that is equivalent to 50% of its trainee intake, with each placement comprising at least 30-35 hours of relevant work experience.
The scheme targets state school students aged 14-18 who would either be the first generation of their family to go to university or who come from a family below the income threshold for free school meals. The key objective is for participants to realise that a career in the legal sector – whether as a lawyer or in legal support – is a realistic ambition.
A&O senior partner David Morley commented: "It is harder now than it was 30 years ago to get into the legal profession if you're from an average or below-average income family. As a profession, we must change that.
"By collaborating across the profession, PRIME will create a step change in the legal sector's commitment to fairer access, giving more students their first insight into the wide variety of career opportunities available in the legal sector. I would urge all law firms to join us in supporting PRIME."
The programme's progress will be externally monitored by the National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER), which will provide an annual performance report, while also working with the Department for Education. The NFER will also be involved in plans to assess the long-term impact of the initiative in improving access to the profession.
Norton Rose chairman Stephen Parish said: "What PRIME can provide in terms of support, structure and commitment is absolutely key to the way in which we can all benefit from such a programme.
"It is fair to say that the legal profession has not been particularly forthcoming in relation to social mobility in the past, and this gives us an opportunity to get involved."
He added: "Social mobility is not about looking good in front of clients or the media, it is about providing access to a wider group – a more diverse group – of talented people, and that is something that we can all benefit from."
At Clifford Chance, the project is being managed by people partner Laura King (pictured).
She said: "We will have to wait and see but surely it is better for us to all work together to try to achieve something than doing nothing at all."
The project will attempt to overcome much-publicised problems with social mobility and the law. A survey of almost 50,000 City professionals by legal recruitment consultancy Laurence Simons at the end of last year found that 15% of lawyers were educated at the UK's 250 public schools, compared with 2% of the general population.
The findings came after a 2009 report looking at fair access to the professions, which found that between 1988 and 2004, the proportion of magic circle partners aged under 39 who had been privately educated increased from 59% to 71%.
Other efforts to improve diversity in the profession will see law firms and barristers' chambers forced to publish internal diversity and social mobility statistics on their websites after the Legal Services Board approved plans earlier this summer.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
Background to the initiative
The PRIME project came about after Allen & Overy (A&O) senior partner David Morley invited senior names from a small group of City law firms to the firm's Bishops Square headquarters to hold discussions about improving social mobility.
The group, which initially comprised A&O, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Clifford Chance, Linklaters, Slaughter and May, Hogan Lovells, Herbert Smith and Norton Rose, were responding to mounting pressure to improve diversity in the legal profession in the wake of a 2009 Government-backed report into social mobility inthe professions, which was compiled by a panel chaired by former cabinet minister Alan Milburn (pictured).
From the point of initial discussions the initiative was expanded to include the 23 members currently signed up – well ahead of the initial expectations – with the number of law firms involved expected to increase over time. Member firms turned to a number of external sources for input including the Cabinet Office, the Sutton Trust and the law societies of England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland, but will pay for the scheme themselves. The total cost of the project to date is undisclosed but has been shared between the firms involved. Morley said that the largest cost will be the involvement of the National Foundation for Educational Research, which will follow and monitor the project through an annual progress report, underlining the firms' commitment to achieving tangible results.
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
Founding members
Addleshaw Goddard
Allen & Overy
Arthur Cox
Ashurst
Blake Lapthorn
Brodies
Clifford Chance
CMS Cameron McKenna
Dickinson Dees
DLA Piper
Dundas & Wilson
Eversheds
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Herbert Smith
Hogan Lovells
Linklaters
Maclay Murray & Spens
McGrigors
Norton Rose
Pinsent Masons
Shepherd & Wedderburn
Slaughter and May
Trowers & Hamlins
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia
What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market
7 minute readReport: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Florida Court Rules in Favor of Production Co. in Dispute Over Viral Documentary 'Died Suddenly'
- 2What We Learned From In-House Lawyers in 2024
- 3Cannabis 'Cannibalization' Among Concerns of NYS Pot Attorneys
- 4Legal Drafting Startup DocDraft AI Launches Drafting, Attorney Service Platform
- 5Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250