New QC round begins as success fee rises again
The QC application process for 2008 was launched today (February 21) - turning the allocation of the kitemark into an annual event. Barristers and solicitor advocates have until 3 April to apply for the 2008 silk round, with successful candidates likely to be announced early next year.
February 21, 2008 at 05:35 AM
2 minute read
The QC application process for 2008 was launched today (February 21) – turning the allocation of the kitemark into an annual event.
Barristers and solicitor advocates have until 3 April to apply for the 2008 silk round, with successful candidates likely to be announced early next year.
The news comes just weeks after almost 100 barristers gained QC status in the 2007 silk round – with that announcement coming a full 18 months after the previous batch of silks were appointed.
The 2008 application process will be similar to last year's round, with applicants expected to show competency in understanding and use of the law; oral and written advocacy; working with others; diversity; and integrity.
Referees have been renamed 'assessors' and their references will now be known as assessments.
Those that are successful will be expected to pay a £3,500 fee – a £500 increase on the last round. Application fees rose by 39% from £1,800 in 2006 to £2,500 in the last round. The application fee will remain the same in this round.
The self-funding QC system was designed to introduce greater transparency into the selection process and handed responsibility for appointments to a nine-member panel chaired by Sir Duncan Nichol.
The panel will remain the same apart that Sir Paul Kennedy will be replacing Baroness Butler-Sloss as the retired judicial member of the selection panel.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Court Upholds Law Forcing Sale or Ban of TikTok in the US
Hungary Seeks to Defeat Holocaust Survivors' Lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1Florida Court Rules in Favor of Production Co. in Dispute Over Viral Documentary 'Died Suddenly'
- 2What We Learned From In-House Lawyers in 2024
- 3Cannabis 'Cannibalization' Among Concerns of NYS Pot Attorneys
- 4Legal Drafting Startup DocDraft AI Launches Drafting, Attorney Service Platform
- 5Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250