Justice Ministry drops high-cost cases contract after low take-up
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has scrapped its contract for very high-cost criminal cases (VHCCs) after just 130 barristers signed up. Instead it is putting together a new line-up that will offer barristers a second chance to join the panel.The MoJ and the Legal Services Commission (LSC) are consulting on the new contract after the poor take-up rate and plan to send it out next week, effectively cancelling the agreement with those barristers and solicitors that already signed up.
February 21, 2008 at 12:48 AM
2 minute read
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has scrapped its contract for very high-cost criminal cases (VHCCs) after just 130 barristers signed up. Instead it is putting together a new line-up that will offer barristers a second chance to join the panel.
The MoJ and the Legal Services Commission (LSC) are consulting on the new contract after the poor take-up rate and plan to send it out next week, effectively cancelling the agreement with those barristers and solicitors that already signed up.
Around 2,300 barristers were given the chance to agree to the original contract – which was intended to reduce fees in major criminal cases – when it was sent out in
January.
While it was unpopular with barristers, virtually all of the 330 law firms that applied for the panel signed up.
In a letter to the profession, Bar Council chairman Timothy Dutton QC commented: "As things stand, no solicitor or barrister has entered into a binding contract with the LSC.
"This is because the LSC has held onto the signed contracts and has not itself signed and returned them. Instead, the LSC proposes a new variant on the scheme."
Under the new terms, solicitors will be paid by the LSC for advocacy services and will in turn be able to negotiate the fees they pay non-panel barristers. The maximum rates will be those on the VHCC contract.
The Bar Council was angered after the LSC denied the Bar's overarching body an extension to consult on the new proposals.
The VHCC contract offers QCs a rate of £476 for each day spent in court. Top junior barristers will receive £390, and a junior acting alone will be paid £285 per day. For preparatory work, silks will earn £91-£145 an hour.
Commenting on the news, legal aid minister Lord Hunt of Kings Heath said: "I hope those members of the Bar who bid for contracts but then chose not to sign them will now reconsider their position."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllVenezuela Faces Creditor Class Action Suit After Missing $1.5B Bond Payments
2 minute readCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Court Upholds Law Forcing Sale or Ban of TikTok in the US
Hungary Seeks to Defeat Holocaust Survivors' Lawsuit
Trending Stories
- 1MoFo Poaches More Tech Talent From Goodwin With 3-Partner ECVC Group
- 2Supreme Court allows investors' class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
- 3Starting a Pro Bono Program: A Blueprint for Law Firms
- 4No Medicare Fraud Here, Says Federal Judge in Case of Foreign Physicians in Operating Room
- 5Trump Names FTC Chair Who's Been Thorn in Side of Lina Khan
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250