Kennedy: 'Give employed bar bigger council role'
Employed and junior barristers are set to be given a greater role on the Bar Council following a report by a working group into the composition of the representative body. The report, published today (23 May), recommends increased representation on the council for specialist bar associations and for young, junior and employed barristers among its 118 members.
May 23, 2007 at 08:13 AM
2 minute read
Employed and junior barristers are set to be given a greater role on the Bar Council following a report by a working group into the composition of the representative body.
The report, published today (23 May), recommends increased representation on the council for specialist bar associations and for young, junior and employed barristers among its 118 members.
The working group, chaired by former Court of Appeal judge Sir Paul Kennedy, also proposes a number of changes to the council's voting system, including replacing the current single transferable vote mechanism with a 'first past the post' system and allowing candidates to stand with the backing of just one other subscriber instead of six.
The proposals are the result of a year-long study into how the composition of the Bar Council should be amended ahead of the incoming Legal Services Bill.
The group concluded that the Bar Council is "generally effective" but said its performance on issues of gender, ethnicity and disability should be kept under review.
The findings come after Lord Neuberger's report last month into widening access to the Bar, which focused primarily on entry to the Bar Vocational Course.
Commenting on the findings, Kennedy said in a statement: "We believe the changes we are proposing will improve representation of the Bar across its broad range of specialisms, while at the same time giving a better share of voice to those barristers outside self-employed practice."
Talkback: Is the Bar Council "generally effective" in your view? Will these measures address its shortcomings? Click here to have your say.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readNorton Rose Sues South Africa Government Over 'Unreasonable' Ethnicity Score System
3 minute readBirkenstocks: Footwear or Fine Art? German Law Firm SKW Schwarz Steps Up in Court
Freshfields and Quinn Emanuel Face Off in Latest JP Morgan-WeRealize Dispute
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'I've Seen Terrible Things': Lawyer Predicts Spike in Hazing Suits
- 2SEC Ordered to Explain ‘How and When the Federal Securities Laws Apply to Digital Assets’
- 3NY Trial Court Halts State Dragnet on Licensed Hemp Operators
- 4Report: US Attorney E. Martin Estrada to Resign From California's Central District
- 5Steve Bannon Ordered Into Court for Questioning Over New Counsel
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250