Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Although it was anticipated that the introduction of the Woolf reforms would lead to more court-appointed experts in complex, high-value cases brought before the Commercial Court and the Technology and Construction Court, it is still normally the case that each party will appoint its own expert to advise and give evidence on the technical aspects of the dispute. Since the court now expressly requires any experts appearing before it to confirm that they have understood and complied with their duty to the court, and instructions to experts are no longer automatically privileged from disclosure, it is more important than ever that the parties appoint suitably qualified and experienced experts in such matters. What makes someone a good expert? There is no single right or easy answer, but those responsible for their selection and appointment may like to consider the following:

This premium content is reserved for
Law.com International Subscribers.


  • Customized news by region including UK, Asia, Europe, Latin America, Middle East, Africa, and North America
  • Cutting-edge research such as UK Top 100, China 45, and Asia 50
  • Get the inside track on the biggest breaking stories that delve deep into the issues behind the headlines
  • Comprehensive coverage of the dynamic legal market from people moves to the major international jurisdictions
  • Global view into how legal tech, business of law, in-house and regulatory environments are intersecting worldwide

Already a subscriber?


Law.com International Newsletters & Briefings

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

Sign up for an unlimited number of complementary newsletters, alerts, and International Briefings. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 American Lawyer Media International, LLC. All Rights Reserved.