• Sayles v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    Sayles v. Allstate Ins. Co. Click Here for ICLC Expert Analysis   Sayles v. Allstate Ins. Co. 2019 Pa. LEXIS 6457 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania May 15, 2019, Argued; November 20, 2019, Decided No. 58 MAP 2018, No. 59 MAP 2018

    Read Full Article

  • Associated Surgical Ctr. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    Associated Surgical Ctr. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. A Michigan court has ruled that a health care provider that held post-treatment assignments from an insured injured in an automobile accident could proceed with its lawsuit against the insurer to collect no-fault benefits. Associated...

    Read Full Article

  • Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co.

    Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co. A California court has ruled that an injured plaintiff who obtained a $1.5 million judgment against an allegedly insolvent driver could proceed with his fraudulent conveyance action against the driver's insurer. Potter v. Alliance United Ins. Co., 2019 Cal. App....

    Read Full Article

  • Parker's Classic Auto Works, Ltd. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

    Parker's Classic Auto Works, Ltd. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Vermont Supreme Court Reinstates Jury Verdict Against Nationwide.   Click Here for ICLC Expert Analysis   Parker's Classic Auto Works, Ltd. v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company 2019 VT 46 Supreme Court of Vermont

    Read Full Article

  • Frederking v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.

    Frederking v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has rejected a policy interpretation that “[o]nly an insurance company could come up with.” Frederking v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 19796, __ F.3d __, 2019 WL 2751700 Click Here for ICLC Expert...

    Read Full Article

  • Unique Ins. Co. v. Perez

    Unique Ins. Co. v. Perez A federal district court in Tennessee has ruled that an exclusion in an automobile insurance policy for criminal conduct foreclosed coverage for an accident caused by the insured while he was intoxicated. Unique Ins. Co. v. Perez, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 110645 Click Here...

    Read Full Article

  • Donovan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    Donovan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. A federal district court in Pennsylvania has ruled that a waiver signed by an insured did not waive the right to aggregate or “stack” the limits of coverage for underinsured benefits between two separate policies of insurance. Donovan v. State Farm Mut....

    Read Full Article

  • Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co.

    Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co. In a dispute involving an insurer's efforts to recover from an alleged tortfeasor the personal injury protection benefits it paid to its insured, the issue of whether the person was a tortfeasor had to be resolved in arbitration, a New Jersey...

    Read Full Article

  • Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sechrist

    Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sechrist The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, affirming a district court's decision, has rejected two employees' claims that they were entitled to $1 million in underinsured motorist benefits. Farmland Mut. Ins. Co. v. Sechrist , 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 13331,...

    Read Full Article

  • Team Rehab. W2 v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

    Team Rehab. W2 v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. Another appellate panel in Michigan has issued a decision rejecting an insurer's contention that it did not have to pay no-fault benefits to a heath care provider because of an anti-assignment provision in its insurance policy. Team Rehab. W2 v....

    Read Full Article