-
Menu
-
- Law.com
- Law.com - United States

- Law.com - International
- Home
- Publications
- Practice Tools
- Events
- Legal Newswire
- Legal Dictionary
- Verdict Search
- Jobs
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- COVID-19
- Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Search-
Insurance Coverage Law Center
-
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- Law.com
- Publications
- The American Lawyer
- National Law Journal
- Corporate Counsel
- New York Law Journal
- The Legal Intelligencer
- The Recorder
- Daily Business Review
- Browse All Publications ➝
- Law Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Law.com
Insurance Coverage Q&A: Roof Damage and Underlying Decking
When a roof is damaged and during repair it is discovered that the decking is worn, should the decking be covered as part of the loss?
Thank you for sharing!
The roof on this home is being replaced due to damages from a covered peril (windstorm/hail). During restoration the contractor discovers that the roof sheathing is made up of 1″x6″ wood planks that would normally be acceptable in this jurisdiction if the gaps between the planks were within the acceptable range of the shingle manufacturer, which they are not. This causes a non-nailable surface situation where the roof sheathing must be replaced with either planks with smaller gaps, or plywood/OSB panels. During the replacement of the roof sheathing the contractor discovers a ridge board in the site-built truss system that has failed. This section of ridge board must be replaced, along with the rafters attached to it, in order for the remaining roof sheathing to be installed over a safe, sound structure. It is not known whether this ridge board was damaged due to storm-related or other forces, or if it was damaged during the reroof process. The reroof can’t be completed until these components are fixed. Currently, there is no specific building code that is triggering either of these issues to be addressed independently of the reroof, but they both directly affect the reroof process.
Questions: Are the costs to remedy these two situations covered within the Dwelling Replacement Cost limits for the windstorm/hail claim or would they go into the Building Code/LO coverage box? Must the roof sheathing and ridge board be damaged by windstorm/hail (as in ADPL) in addition to the roof covering in order to be covered at all?
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Review Policy Analysis from Insurance Industry Experts
Get access to the daily questions insurance professionals ask our industry experts.
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Woman Caught STD in Car, Auto Insurance to Pay Out $5.2 Million
The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.
Back Issues ›
Eye on the Experts
Industry News
- Insurers Are Seeing Some Benefits from Tough Economic Environment, Study Shows
- Insured Maui fire losses likely to top $1 billion
- California Homeowners Market Continues Shrinking
- Delaware Issues Bulletin Regarding False Representations Regarding Rates
- Florida Emergency Rule and Memorandum Regarding Claims-Handling Manuals
About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy
Publications
Law Topics
Rankings
More
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.





