X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Our insured sold a vehicle to a customer who used a credit card. The credit card was later determined to be stolen so the bank reversed the transaction. It is my position that this is exactly what the attached endorsement (CA 25 03 False Pretense Coverage) is meant to cover. The carrier is suggesting that it is not covered because: b.(s) states false pretense coverage does not apply to a loss which, for any reason, a bank or other drawee fails to pay. The proximate cause of this loss is the false pretense. Would you agree with the carrier?

Missouri Subscriber

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

Kelly Helton, JD

 

Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.