Preventing Bad-Faith Insurance Litigation in Georgia
To better navigate this needlessly complex area of law, insurers should have a good grasp on the current legal landscape surrounding the Holt rule, how intended “fixes” may not prevent bad-faith litigation, and best practices and considerations that are available when a Holt demand comes in the door.
(l-r) Alston & Bird attorneys Jenny Hergenrother, Alan Pryor, John Lex Kenerly and Andy Tuck. (Courtesy photos)Insurance policy limit demands for personal injury claims (commonly known as Holt demands) remain a thorny issue in Georgia. “Set-up” Holt demands—complete with vague and confusing conditions and shady releases—remain commonplace in hopes that unwary insurers “botch” their responses and become ensnared in multimillion-dollar bad-faith litigation.
To better navigate this needlessly complex area of law, insurers should have a good grasp on the current legal landscape surrounding the Holt rule, how intended “fixes” may not prevent bad-faith litigation, and best practices and considerations that are available when a Holt demand comes in the door.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.






