-
Menu
-
- Law.com
- Law.com - United States

- Law.com - International
- Home
- Publications
- Practice Tools
- Events
- Legal Newswire
- Legal Dictionary
- Verdict Search
- Jobs
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- COVID-19
- Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Search-
Insurance Coverage Law Center
-
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- Law.com
- Publications
- The American Lawyer
- National Law Journal
- Corporate Counsel
- New York Law Journal
- The Legal Intelligencer
- The Recorder
- Daily Business Review
- Browse All Publications ➝
- Law Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Law.com
The Coverage Must Go On For Theater Security Guard
The employer asserted the “positive work order” defense, which required proof that there was a specific policy in place, the claimant knew about the employer's policy, and that the claimant’s conduct at the time of injury removed the claimant from the course of employment.
Thank you for sharing!
A theater security guard’s award of workers compensation benefits has been affirmed by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania even though the guard used a building entrance that his employer had prohibited employees from using. The case is Fine Arts Discovery Series, Inc. v. Critton, 2022 Pa. Commw. Unpub. LEXIS 444 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2022). Please note that this case is an unpublished decision and may be cited and relied upon when relevant under the doctrine of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. It may also be cited for its persuasive value, but not as binding precedent.
Daniel Critton worked as a security guard at a theater run by Fine Arts Discovery. In February 2019, Critton attended a theater staff meeting where the head of security reminded employees that they should not use the back entrance; this point was repeated at a special meeting for security staff, including Critton, later that same day. A few weeks later, Critton was walking to the back entrance of the theater to begin his shift when he was injured slipping on ice. The injury was immediately reported, and Critton was treated for a broken arm at the emergency room. Fine Arts Discovery denied his claim because he was using the back entrance at the time he broke his arm. Before a workers compensation judge (WCJ), Fine Arts Discovery asserted the “positive work order” defense, which requires an employer to prove that there was a specific policy in place, the claimant employee knew about the policy, and that the claimant’s conduct at the time of injury removed the claimant from the course of employment.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Kelly Helton, JD
Review Policy Analysis from Insurance Industry Experts
Get access to the daily questions insurance professionals ask our industry experts.
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Woman Caught STD in Car, Auto Insurance to Pay Out $5.2 Million
The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.
Back Issues ›
Eye on the Experts
Industry News
- Insurers Are Seeing Some Benefits from Tough Economic Environment, Study Shows
- Insured Maui fire losses likely to top $1 billion
- California Homeowners Market Continues Shrinking
- Delaware Issues Bulletin Regarding False Representations Regarding Rates
- Florida Emergency Rule and Memorandum Regarding Claims-Handling Manuals
About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy
Publications
Law Topics
Rankings
More
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.





