Should Insurer Cover Costs for Related but Separate Cases?
Several questions centered on policy language barring coverage for claims that are "the same as or related to" each other, not necessarily identical.
The Delaware Supreme Court has been asked to decide just how interconnected two separate cases against a corporation need to be for insurers to fund the litigation of both.
In virtual argument before the court Wednesday morning, counsel for Arizona-based solar power component manufacturer and services provider First Solar Inc. said two insurance companies should be required to pay for the defense of two federal securities suits because each case dealt with a different element of First Solar’s business and a different set of alleged false and misleading statements.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.