-
Menu
-
- Law.com
- Law.com - United States
- Law.com - International
- Home
- Publications
- Practice Tools
- Events
- Legal Newswire
- Legal Dictionary
- Verdict Search
- Jobs
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- COVID-19
- Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Search
-
Insurance Coverage Law Center
-
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- Law.com
- Publications
- The American Lawyer
- National Law Journal
- Corporate Counsel
- New York Law Journal
- The Legal Intelligencer
- The Recorder
- Daily Business Review
- Browse All Publications ➝
- Law Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Law.com
US Supreme Court Paves the Way for College Athletes to Get Paid
The decision is a leap for college athletes as it expands their access to unrestricted education-related payments. It represents another step toward expanded rights, protections, and opportunities for student-athletes.
Thank you for sharing!
On June 21, 2021, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that college athletes are eligible to receive unrestricted education-related payments – a landmark decision that could act as the catalyst for change with respect to college athletes’ rights.
The case involved National Collegiate Athletic Association (the “NCAA”) rules that place limits on educational benefits for college athletes, such as post-eligibility scholarships, graduate or vocational school scholarships, and academic tutoring. The plaintiffs, present and former student-athletes in men’s Division 1 Football Bowl Subdivision and men’s and women’s Division 1 basketball, brought an antitrust lawsuit challenging the NCAA’s rules that limit the compensation they may receive in exchange for their athletic services. The plaintiffs alleged that the NCAA’s rules violated §1 of the Sherman Act, which prohibits contracts, combinations, or conspiracies in restraint of trade or commerce. 15 U. S. C. § 1. The NCAA argued, in essence, that its rules preserve amateurism, which widens consumer choice by providing amateur college sports as distinct from professional sports. The Supreme Court noted that the key facts in the case were undisputed – the NCAA has rules regarding compensation limits for student-athletes; the NCAA enforces these limits on schools; and the compensation limits affect interstate commerce.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Review Policy Analysis from Insurance Industry Experts
Get access to the daily questions insurance professionals ask our industry experts.
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Woman Caught STD in Car, Auto Insurance to Pay Out $5.2 Million
The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.
Back Issues ›
Eye on the Experts
Industry News
- Insurers Are Seeing Some Benefits from Tough Economic Environment, Study Shows
- Insured Maui fire losses likely to top $1 billion
- California Homeowners Market Continues Shrinking
- Delaware Issues Bulletin Regarding False Representations Regarding Rates
- Florida Emergency Rule and Memorandum Regarding Claims-Handling Manuals
About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy
Publications
Law Topics
Rankings
More
Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.