Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Arizona Court of Appeals has addressed the increasingly common language property insurers use in policies to preclude or limit the coverage for animals or damage caused by animals. The case is Goldberger v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.448 P.3d 302 (Ariz. App. 2019).

The Goldbergers were the owners of a residential rental property with an insurance policy for that property through State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm). The policy was a rental dwelling policy. The Goldbergers filed a claim for $75,000 worth of coverage after their tenant “allowed” feral cats to “access” the property and cause “accidental damage.” State Farm denied the claim, citing an exclusion in the policy for damage caused by “domestic animals.” The Goldbergers disagreed and sued State Farm alleging breach of contract and insurance bad faith.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

Hannah Smith


Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.