X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri has decided that an excess and surplus lines insurer does not have to defend a suit brought against a vape store by a customer who suffered severe burns after e-cigarette batteries exploded in his pocket. The case is Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Vapor, No. 4:20-00328-CV-RK, 2021 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5296 (W.D. Mo. Jan. 12, 2021).

Scottsdale Insurance Company issued an insurance policy to Aqueous Vapor, a vape shop. The policy contained a Commercial General Liability part and a Commercial Property Coverage part. While the policy was effective, a customer of Aqueous Vapor, Adam Williams, was injured just after he installed the batteries into his e-cigarette, when the battery exploded in his pocket. Williams suffered second- and third-degree burns which required extensive medical care, including skin grafts. When the explosion occurred, Williams was no longer on the premises of the vape shop.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

Hannah Smith

 

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.