X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Insurance policy Insurance agent hand holding clipboard with policy form and businessman signs agreement protection document.

On Nov. 23, the Appellate Division decided Rafanello v. Taylor-Esquivel, a case marked for publication. Although Rafanello arises in an insurance context, it is primarily a statutory construction decision that reflects statutory language that determines state policy by directing an outcome on a basis far broader than the narrow coverage and exclusions contained in a liability policy.

The facts of the case are simple and straightforward. Plaintiff Rafanello was injured when rear-ended by a dump truck operated by defendant, Taylor-Esquivel, during the course of his employment with NAB Trucking. Rafanello carried his own automobile insurance with Encompass Property & Casualty Insurance Company, having UM/UIM coverage of $250,000 per person and $500,000 per accident. NAB also had a $750,000 liability policy for the dump truck from American Millennium Insurance Company (AMIC). However, the policy included a step-down provision which provided for maximum liability coverage only in the sum of $35,000, for accidents involving drivers not listed as a “Covered Driver” under the policy. Taylor-Esquivel was not listed as a covered driver, although it had been NAB’s intent to include him as a covered driver under the $750,000 AMIC liability policy.

 

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.