Bad Faith Claims Increasing in Connecticut for UM/UIM Complaints
Some Connecticut courts have not been receptive, often striking such claims at the pleading stage, while others have begun applying a less stringent standard for pleading bad faith.
Elizabeth O. Hoff, Associate, and Melicent B. Thompson, Partner, at Gfeller Laurie, LLP.
Claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (“common law bad faith”) have been appearing more frequently in Connecticut complaints for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage. Connecticut courts generally have not been receptive, often striking such claims at the pleading stage, especially where they merely describe a dispute over coverage. This is noteworthy given that more recently, some Connecticut courts also have begun applying a less stringent standard for pleading bad faith. Here we discuss this trend and Connecticut courts’ treatment of these claims at the pleading stage, demonstrating that carriers are best positioned to avoid common law bad faith claims in the uninsured/underinsured motorist context by employing procedures that ensure timely and thorough investigation and documentation of claims and timely, clear and direct communication with claimants regarding the bases for the insurer’s coverage position.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.