X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Photo: Shutterstock

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear argument on whether the Superior Court properly held that a woman who started moving out of her parents’ house before her death in an auto accident no longer qualified as a “resident relative” under her parents’ insurance policy and was therefore not entitled to stacked UIM coverage.

The justices granted allocatur early this month in Grix v. Progressive Specialty Insurance, where previously a three-judge appeals panel unanimously ruled to affirm a Juniata County trial court’s grant of summary judgment to an insurer who denied a claim for stacked UIM benefits by the parents of a woman who was killed in a motor vehicle accident.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.