Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

An insurer may have to indemnify the owner of a plumbing company in a wrongful death lawsuit filed by the estate of a worker after a three-judge panel of 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a district court’s decision that the company’s liability and workers compensation policy exclusions barred coverage of those claims. The case is Maxum Indem. Co. v. Massaro, No. 18-12988, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 19230 (11th Cir. June 19, 2020).

Pedro Jose Sanchez worked for 3rd Generation, a plumbing contractor. While at work, Sanchez was injured when performing mechanical work on a tractor. He died from these injuries. Sanchez’s estate received workers’ compensation benefits. The personal representative of Sanchez’s estate sued James Massaro, the president, secretary, and sole director of 3rd Generation, for wrongful death based on a failure to follow the appropriate procedures. 3rd Generation was insured by Maxum Indemnity Company, who filed a federal declaratory action seeking a determination of whether, under the terms of 3rd Generation’s CGL policy, Maxim owed a duty to defend and indemnify Massaro in the wrongful death action. At summary judgment, the court ruled that no duty was owed.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

Hannah Smith


Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.