Conflicting Policy Provisions Lead to Coverage for Fire at Insured’s Home. Plus, Estoppel.
A trial court in New York has ruled that because a homeowner’s insurance policy contained conflicting provisions, an insurance company had to cover…
A trial court in New York has ruled that because a homeowner’s insurance policy contained conflicting provisions, an insurance company had to cover the damages the insured suffered when one of his two homes was destroyed by fire. The trial court also ruled that the insurer was estopped from denying coverage.
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Copyright © 2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.