Construction

Colorado Supreme Court Declines to Extend Notice-Prejudice Rule to No-Voluntary-Payments Clause

The Colorado Supreme Court, reversing a decision by an intermediate appellate court, has declined to extend the notice-prejudice rule (which it previously…

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The Colorado Supreme Court, reversing a decision by an intermediate appellate court, has declined to extend the notice-prejudice rule (which it previously had applied to the notice provision of an occurrence-based liability policy in Friedland v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 105 P.3d 639 (Colo. 2005)) to a no-voluntary-payments clause.

The Case

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy

Publications

Law Topics

Rankings

More

Law.com

Copyright © 2023 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.