X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon has ruled that an indemnity clause in an agreement between two parties relating to the rehabilitation of a bridge was a construction agreement for purposes of the Oregon law that prohibits indemnity clauses in construction agreements.

The Case

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.