-
Menu
-
- Law.com
- Law.com - United States
- Law.com - International
- Home
- Publications
- Practice Tools
- Events
- Legal Newswire
- Legal Dictionary
- Verdict Search
- Jobs
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- COVID-19
- Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Search
-
Insurance Coverage Law Center
-
- Insurance Coverage Law Center Home
- Law.com
- Publications
- The American Lawyer
- National Law Journal
- Corporate Counsel
- New York Law Journal
- The Legal Intelligencer
- The Recorder
- Daily Business Review
- Browse All Publications ➝
- Law Topics
- Litigation
- Deals and Transactions
- Law Firm Management
- Legal Practice Management
- Legal Technology
- Intellectual Property
- Cybersecurity
- All Law Topics ➝
- Sections
- Case Law Analysis
- Policy Analysis
- Legislative & Regulatory
- Verdicts & Settlements
- Eye on the Experts
- Cases
- Analysis
- Forms
- News
- Insurance Dictionary
- About Us
- About Us
- Contact Us
- All Sections
- Advertise
- Customer Care
- Terms of Service
- FAQ
- Privacy Policy
- Follow Insurance Coverage Law Center
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
11th Circuit, Relying on Legislative History, Finds that Florida Insurer’s Obligation to Pay PIP Benefits Was Limited to $2,500 in Absence of Finding of Emergency Medical Condition
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, interpreting amendments to the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, Fla. Stat. §§ 627.730-627.7405,…
Thank you for sharing!
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, interpreting amendments to the Florida Motor Vehicle No-Fault Law, Fla. Stat. §§ 627.730-627.7405, has ruled that an insurer was obligated to pay only $2,500 in personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits where no medical provider had made any determination about whether the insured’s injury was an “emergency medical condition.”
The Case
This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.
Enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.
- Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
- Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
- Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].
Review Policy Analysis from Insurance Industry Experts
Get access to the daily questions insurance professionals ask our industry experts.
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Insurance Coverage Law Report
Woman Caught STD in Car, Auto Insurance to Pay Out $5.2 Million
The Missouri woman sued Geico claiming that she contracted a sexually transmitted disease from the car owner after the two had sex inside a car covered by the insurer.
Back Issues ›
Eye on the Experts
Industry News
- Insurers Are Seeing Some Benefits from Tough Economic Environment, Study Shows
- Insured Maui fire losses likely to top $1 billion
- California Homeowners Market Continues Shrinking
- Delaware Issues Bulletin Regarding False Representations Regarding Rates
- Florida Emergency Rule and Memorandum Regarding Claims-Handling Manuals
About Us / Contact Us / Site Map / Advertise With Us/ Customer Service / Terms of Service/ FAQ / Privacy Policy
Publications
Law Topics
Rankings
More
Copyright © 2024 ALM Global, LLC. All Rights Reserved.