X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

An intermediate appellate court in New York has ruled that a “Dishonest Acts Exclusion” did not bar coverage of amounts paid by Bear Stearns to settle with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) – but that Bear Stearns’ professional liability and excess insurance carriers could proceed with their contention that public policy did bar coverage.

The Case

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

 

Copyright © 2022 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Live Chat