X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

We would like your opinion as to which carrier would be primary/excess or if they should share.  The plaintiff alleges that she slipped and fell on an accumulation of ice and snow while she was walking to the parking lot. All snow removal is done in house, no outside companies. Our policy covers the management company directly; the owner is not an additional insured under our policy. On the other hand, our insured as the property manager is insured under the owner’s policy, so he has coverage under both policies.

The insurance carrier for the owner of the property has taken the position that our insured (the property manager) is an insured under its policy, but the carrier points out the policy conditions which it believes clearly states that its policy is excess to ours. We disagree. Based on a review of the two insurance policies, we believe that the owner’s coverage should be primary.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

ICLC Staff Writer

 

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.