Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

Vacancy Definition under Scrutiny

Our question is on form BP 00 02 01 87 under the vacancy provision, which contains an exclusion for buildings that have been “vacant” for more than sixty days. However, there is no definition given for “vacancy.” Our concern is with condo associations insured under this form. Many associations are now constructing single family units. Many folks that own these units have them for seasonal occupancy, which means that they are not there for extended periods of time, which can cause problems under this coverage exclusion. With no definition being given we have resorted to Webster for their definition of vacant. This describes vacant as being empty, having no contents, and void. This definition leads us to believe that in our case, the condo unit is not vacant during those extended periods of time that the owners are away, as their furnishings are there. Please provide your interpretation of the vacancy clause.

This premium content is locked for
Insurance Coverage Law Center subscribers only.

Start a free trial to enjoy unlimited access to the single source of objective legal analysis, practical insights, and news for the insurance industry.

  • Access the most current expert analysis and daily developments across jurisdictions
  • Solve complex research issues with expert tools and intelligence
  • Tap into insurance coverage expert guidance

Already have an account?
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected].

ICLC Staff Writer


Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Live Chat