Lawyers for the defendants in a high profile sexual discrimination suit are asking that the case be arbitrated, rather than heard by a panel of state court justices.

The suit against several partners of venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers—based in the Silicon Valley—was filed by former Kleiner partner Ellen Pao. Pao was fired in October 2012, five months after filing her suit.

Details of her complaint are unclear, but lawyers say they involve Pao’s sexual relationship with another Kleiner partner. Lawyers for the defendants claim they would like the case arbitrated for two reasons: to avoid disclosing compensation information of Kleiner executives and to spare Pao embarrassment.

Pao, however, wants her “day in court,” she said after the hearing this week. “They continue to drag this out.”

Kleiner disagrees. “The issues Pao is litigating involve economics of the funds she was involved with,” the firm said in a statement. “All of those economic issues are governed by the Managing LLC agreements which require that disputes be resolved through arbitration.”

Pao argued that she is suing the company itself, not the fund. And a lower court judge agreed with her. Kleiner appealed.

The suit has garnered a lot of attention because it underscores issues of sex discrimination, particularly in the tech sector.

The justice panel has 90 days to issue its decision.

Read more about this story on Thomson Reuters.

See more recent labor and employment stories on InsideCounsel:

7-Eleven owners exploited illegal workers

Labor: How the NLRB analyzes handbooks and policies

Condé Nast is latest target of unpaid internship lawsuits

4th Circuit invalidates NLRB poster rule

Two Biglaw firms contend with employment litigation

Labor: Staying sharp with regular handbook review

Dollar General sued over background check practice