• vMedex, Inc. v. TDS Operating, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-09
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Noreika
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ann M. Kashishian, Kashisian Law LLC, Wilmington, DE; Marlo J. Hittman, Law Office of Marlo J. Hittman, Livingston, NJ for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Marc S. Casarino, White & Williams LLP, Wilmington, DE; David M. Friebus, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.

    Case Number: D69116

    Plaintiffs adequately alleged one of their claims for breach of contract, but the court granted motions to dismiss the remainder of their claims.

  • XAPT Corp. v. Deere & Co., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-09-02
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Manufacturing | Software
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Connolly
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael J. Flynn, Aubrey J. Morin, Andrew M. Moshos, R. Judson Scaggs, Jr. and Zi-Xiang Shen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Kara E.F. Cenar, S. Patrick McKey, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C., Chicago, IL; Ronnie L. White, II and Mary Ann L. Wymore, Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale, P.C., St. Louis, MO; Lauren Jaffe and Mariangela Seale, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila LLP, Chicago, IL; James L. Higgins, Steven W. Lee and Melanie K. Sharp, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendant.

    Case Number: D69109

    Plaintiff's breach of contract action was not the functional equivalent of a copyright infringement claim, so the court granted a motion remanding this matter back to state court.

  • Schneider Nat'l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz

    Publication Date: 2020-07-29
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Transportation
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael A. Pittenger and Caneel Radinson-Blasucci, Potter, Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Locke Beatty, Brian Riopelle and Heryka R. Knoespel, McGuire Woods LLP, Raleigh, NC for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John M. Seaman and Matthew L. Miller, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; Anthony S. Fiotto and Kate E. MacLeman Goodwin Proctor LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.

    Case Number: D69068

    Factual issues regarding the parties' obligations under an asset purchase agreement and conflicting testimony about the parties' negotiations precluded summary judgment.

  • HUMC Holdco, LLC v. MPT of Hoboken TRS, LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-07-15
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Real Estate
    Court: Court of Chancery
    Judge: Vice Chancellor McCormick
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Susan M. Hannigan, Robert L. Burns, Ryan D. Konstanzer and Megan E. O’Connor, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
    for defendant: Michael P. Kelley and Andrew S. Dupre, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Ackal, III and D. Scott Funk, Gray Reed & McGraw LLP, Houston, TX for Hoboken MPT defendants. Patricia L. Enerio and Jamie L. Brown, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christopher J. Sullivan, Dominic J. Picca and LisaMarie Collins, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., New York, NY for Propco, Alaris and Opco defendants.

    Case Number: D69049

    Factual issues precluded judgment on the pleadings with respect to issues involving a right of first refusal and transfer restrictions under a limited liability company agreement.

  • GEA Sys. N. Am. LLC v. Golden State Food Corp.

    Publication Date: 2020-06-24
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Davis
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David E. Ross, Bradley R. Aronstam and R. Garrett Rice, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; E. Hutchinson Robbins, Jr. and Megan B. Burnet, Miles & Stockbridge P.C., Baltimore, MD for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Patricia L. Enerio and Gillian L. Andrews, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Randy K. Jones and Ann-Marie Dao, Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., San Diego, CA for defendant Golden State Foods Corp. Brian M. Rostocki, Benjamin Chapple and Justin M. Forcier, Reed Smith LLP, Wilmington, DE for third-party defendant Allianz Global Risks U.S. Ins. Co.

    Case Number: D69025

    In this breach of contract action, defendant adequately alleged a negligence counterclaim, but the court dismissed the remaining counterclaims.

  • Law Journal Press | Digital Book

    Texas Legal Malpractice & Lawyer Discipline 2023

    Authors: Charles F. Herring, JR, Jason M. Panzer, Leah Turner

    View this Book

    View more book results for the query "*"

  • RBATHTDSR, LLC v. Project 64 LLC

    Publication Date: 2020-06-10
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Construction
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Scott T. Earle, Zarwin Baum DeVito Kaplan Schaer Toddy, P.C., Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Paul A. Bradley, Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC, Wilmington, DE; Thomas J. Connick, Connick Law LLC, Beachwood, OH for defendants.

    Case Number: D69011

    Plaintiff stated a claim for breach of contract, but the gist of the action doctrine barred the tort claims.

  • GXP Capital, LLC v. Argonaut Mfg. Serv., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-05-20
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Manufacturing
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge Wallace
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David L. Finger, Finger & Slanina, LLC, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin M. Carson, Law Offices of Benjamin M. Carson, La Jolla, CA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: John L. Reed, Harrison S. Carpenter, of DLA Piper LLP (US), Wilmington, DE; Brian A. Foster, Noah A. Katsell and Julie Gryce, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA for defendants.

    Case Number: D68985

    Defendants were entitled to relief based on forum non conveniens, but instead of dismissal, the court imposed a stay.

  • Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy v. Collision Commc'ns, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2020-05-13
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Delaware Superior Court
    Judge: Judge LeGrow
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James J. Freebery, Daniel J. Brown, Hayley J. Reese, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; David Himelfardm McCarter & English, LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
    for defendant: Douglas D. Herrmann and James H.S. Levine, Pepper Hamilton LLP, Wilmington, DE; Tyler E. Chapman of Todd & Weld, LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.

    Case Number: D68980

    The court granted defendant's motion for a stay, because this case was contemporaneously filed with another proceeding, and the parties were more naturally aligned in the other proceeding.

  • Pharmacy Corp. of Am./Askari Consol. Litig.

    Publication Date: 2020-05-06
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Retail
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge: District Judge Andrews
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey S. Goddess, Cooch & Taylor, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brian C. Dunning, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, New York, NY; James Sawyer, Dunning Rievman & Davies LLP, Jericho, NY for Kaveh Askari and Onco 360 parties. Brett D. Fallon, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE ; Christopher G. Kelly, Stosh Silivos, Holland & Knight LLP, New York, NY; Jeremy M. Sternberg, Holland & Knight LLP, Boston, MA for Pharmacy Corp. parties.
    for defendant:

    Case Number: D68972

    The court denied plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment, because they did not demonstrate that an increase in a working capital loan constituted a "major decision" under the terms of their agreements.

  • Cabela's LLC v. Highby

    Publication Date: 2020-04-29
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Retail
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Judge: Judge McKee
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: D68965

    Another state had a more substantial connection to the parties' dispute, so that state's law regarding restraints on trade ap-plied to this dispute. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction.