An open-ended investment company holding notes to two investment vehicles cannot pursue claims against another noteholder because the indenture does not permit such litigation, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled. The high court issued the opinion last week when it affirmed the Court of Chancery’s dismissal of the lawsuit on the same grounds.
Two affiliates of Marsico Capital issued notes through a private placement under a December 2007 indenture. In 2010, the affiliates, Marsico Superholdco LLC and Marsico Superholdco Notes Corp., amended the indenture as part of a financial restructuring. Goldman Sachs owned a majority of the notes through two of its mezzanine funds, GS Mezzanine Partners 2006 LP and GS Mezzanine Partners V LP. Both Goldman Sachs funds voted to approve the indenture’s amendments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]